Canada will push to keep bank capital rules on schedule

























OTTAWA (Reuters) – Canada will urge all countries to stick to the agreed schedule for implementing tougher bank capital rules at a November 4-5 meeting of finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20 nations, a senior finance ministry official said on Thursday.


The so-called Basel III rules are the world’s regulatory response to the financial crisis, forcing banks to triple the amount of basic capital they hold in a bid to avoid future taxpayer bailouts.





















They were to be phased in from January 2013 but areas such as the United States and the European Union are not yet ready and U.S. and British supervisors have criticized them as too complex to work.


The Canadian official, who briefed reports ahead of the meeting on condition that he not be named, said it was imperative that the rules, the timelines and the principles behind them be respected and said Finance Minister Jim Flaherty would make that view known to his G20 colleagues.


Canada sees the European debt crisis as the biggest near-term risk to the global economy, and it also expects the U.S. debt crisis to be top of mind at the talks, the official said.


But the meeting takes place just before the U.S. presidential election and U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will be absent, so it remains unclear how much the G20 can pressure Washington on that front.


Some other countries have also scaled back their delegations, raising doubts about how meaningful the meeting will be.


The official dismissed that argument, saying high-level officials substituting for their ministers allowed for extremely important issues to be addressed anyway.


He said holding each country around the table accountable to its past commitments helped keep the momentum going toward resolving global economic problems.


(Reporting by Louise Egan; Writing by David Ljunggren; Editing by M.D. Golan)


Canada News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Microsoft versus Google trial raises concerns over courtroom secrecy

























SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Two weeks before trial in a high-stakes lawsuit pitting Google‘s Motorola Mobility unit against Microsoft, Google made what has become a common request for a tech company fighting for billions of dollars: a public court proceeding conducted largely in secret.


Google, like its counterparts in the smartphone patent wars, is eager to keep sensitive business information under wraps — in this case, the royalty deals that Motorola cuts with other companies on patented technology.





















Such royalty rates, though, are the central issue in this trial, which starts November 13 in Seattle. U.S. District Judge James Robart has granted requests to block many pre-trial legal briefs from public view. Though he has warned he may get tougher on the issue, the nature of the case raises the possibility even his final decision might include redacted, or blacked-out, sections.


Legal experts are increasingly troubled by the level of secrecy that has become commonplace in intellectual property cases where overburdened judges often pay scant attention to the issue.


Widespread sealing of documents infringes on the basic American legal principle that court should be public, says law professor Dennis Crouch, and actually encourages companies to use a costly, tax-payer funded resource to resolve their disputes.


“There are plenty of cases that have settled because one party didn’t want their information public,” said Crouch, an intellectual property professor at University of Missouri School of Law.


Tech companies counter that they should not be forced to reveal private business information as the price for having their day in court. The law does permit confidential information to be kept from public view in some circumstances–though the companies must compellingly show the disclosure would be harmful. Google argues that revelations about licensing negotiations would give competitors “additional leverage and bargaining power and would lead to an unfair advantage.”


Robart has not yet ruled on Google‘s request, which includes not only keeping documents under seal but also clearing the courtroom during crucial testimony. It is also unclear whether he will redact any discussion of royalty rates in his final opinion. The judge, who will decide this part of the case without a jury, did not respond to requests for comment.


NOT PAYING ATTENTION


Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp have been litigating in courts around the world against Google Inc and partners like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, which use the Android operating system on their mobile devices.


Apple contends that Android is basically a copy of its iOS smartphone software, and Microsoft holds patents that it contends cover a number of Android features. Google bought Motorola for $ 12.5 billion, partly to use its large portfolio of communications patents as a bargaining chip against its competitors.


Robart will decide how big a royalty Motorola deserves from Microsoft for a license on some Motorola wireless and video patents.


Apple, for its part, is set to square off against Motorola on Monday in Madison, Wisconsin, in a case that that involves many of the same issues.


In Wisconsin, Apple and Motorola have filed the overwhelming majority of court documents entirely under seal. U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb did not require them to seek advance permission to file them secretly, nor did she mandate that the companies make redacted copies available for the public.


Judges have broad discretion in granting requests to seal documents. The legal standard for such requests can be high, but in cases where both sides want the proceedings to be secret, judges have little incentive to thoroughly review secrecy requests.


In Apple‘s Northern California litigation against Samsung, both parties also sought to keep many documents under seal. After Reuters intervened to challenge the requests, on grounds it wanted to report financial details, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ordered both companies to disclose a range of information that they considered secret — including profit margins on individual products — but not licensing deals. Apple and Samsung are appealing the disclosure order.


In response to questions from Reuters last week, Judge Crabb in Wisconsin, who will also decide the case without a jury, acknowledged that she had not been paying attention to how many documents were being filed under seal. Federal judges in Madison will now require that parties file redacted briefs, she said, though as of Wednesday Apple and Motorola were still filing key briefs entirely under seal.


“Just because there is a seed or kernel of confidential information doesn’t mean an entire 25-page brief should be sealed,” said Bernard Chao, an IP professor at University of Denver Sturm College of Law.


Crabb promised that the upcoming trial would be open.


“Whatever opinion I make is not going to be redacted,” she told Reuters in an interview.


CHECKING THE COMPS


Microsoft sued Motorola two years ago, saying Motorola had promised to license its so-called “standards essential” patents at a fair rate, in exchange for the technology being adopted as a norm industrywide. But by demanding roughly $ 4 billion a year in revenue, Microsoft says Motorola broke its promise.


Robart will sort out what a reasonable royalty for those standards patents should be, partly by reviewing deals Motorola struck with other companies such as IBM and Research in Motion — much like an appraiser checking comparable properties to figure out whether a home is priced right.


Yet in this case, the public may not be able to understand exactly what figures Robart is comparing. In addition to Google‘s motion to seal those licensing terms, IBM and RIM have also asked Robart to keep the information secret.


“Competitors and potential counterparties to licensing and settlement agreements would gain an unfair insight into IBM’s analyses,” that company wrote.


Microsoft has supported Google‘s bids to seal documents in the past, and vice versa, though Microsoft has not yet taken a position on Google‘s latest request. Representatives for Microsoft and Google declined to comment.


Chao doesn’t think Robart will ultimately redact his own ruling, even though it may include discussion of the specific royalty rates. “I can’t imagine that,” he said.


Most judges cite lack of resources and overflowing dockets as the reason why they don’t scrutinze secrecy requests more closely — especially when both parties support them.


In Wisconsin, Crabb said that even though she will now require litigants to ask permission to file secret documents, it is highly unlikely that she will actually read those arguments — unless someone else flags a problem.


“We’re paddling madly to stay afloat,” Crabb said.


(Reporting by Dan Levine in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Bill Rigby in Seattle. Editing by Jonathan Weber and Andrew Hay)


Tech News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Blake Shelton dominates Country Music awards

























NASHVILLE, Tennessee (Reuters) – Blake Shelton dominated the Country Music Association awards on Thursday, taking home three trophies, including the coveted entertainer of the year prize, on country music‘s biggest night.


Shelton, 36, whose popularity has rocketed since he became a judge in 2011 on the TV singing contest “The Voice,” also won male vocalist of the year for a third time.





















Shelton shared song of the year honors with his wife, Miranda Lambert, for the emotional ballad “Over You”, while Lambert took home the female vocalist prize, also for the third time.


Shelton looked stunned as he accepted the biggest award of the night, beating out recent arrivals Jason Aldean, country-pop crossover sensation Taylor Swift and veterans Brad Paisley and Kenny Chesney. He has not released an album since “Red River Blue” in July 2011.


“Man! Entertainer of the year? What are you talking about?” he said. “I know I am not out there on the road as much. I don’t know how this happened. I freaking love it though.”


“I know I have a side job,” he said, referring to his TV gig, “but country music is still what I love doing.”


Swift, who won entertainer of the year last year and in 2009, and Aldean both came away empty-handed. Eric Church, who went into Thursday’s awards show with a leading five nominations, went home with one award – album of the year for “Chief.”


“I spent a lot of my career wondering where I fit in – country or rock? I want to thank you guys for giving me somewhere to hang my hat,” said Church, 35, sporting a baseball cap and sunglasses.


Church, who got his first CMA nomination just a year ago, told reporters backstage that he never thought he could win a CMA award. “I can distinctly remember playing for about eight people in Amarillo, Texas, about four years ago and to get from there to here is surreal,” he said.


REMEMBERING VICTIMS OF SANDY


The awards show, broadcast live from Nashville, kicked off with a shout-out to those affected on the U.S. East Coast by Hurricane Sandy, and included appeals to viewers to donate to the Red Cross during the show.


Country music has always lifted people up in tough times, and we hope to do that tonight,” said co-host Carrie Underwood.


The country world paid tribute to singer and songwriter Willie Nelson, 79, and his storied career, presenting him with the inaugural Willie Nelson lifetime achievement award.


Nelson performed his signature 1980 song “On the Road Again,” while Lady Antebellum, Shelton, Keith Urban, Faith Hill and Tim McGraw did the honors with a medley of his hits “Crazy,” “Whiskey River” and “Good Hearted Woman.”


“How many push-ups can you do with that one?” joked Nelson as he accepted the huge trophy. “Thank you all out there. Appreciate it.”


Alabama quartet Little Big Town scooped up two awards, winning vocal group of the year, and single of the year for the group’s hit record “Pontoon.”


The band, which started out in 1998 but did not begin to make an impact until 2005, was ecstatic. “This has been a 13-year journey. Nashville, you have made us your band,” said singer Kimberley Schlapman.


The show also saw performances by Swift, debuting her new single, Dierks Bentley, The Band Perry, Aldean, the Zac Brown Band and Kelly Clarkson.


Husband-and-wife team Thompson Square took home the prize for best vocal duo, and Louisiana native Hunter Hayes, 21, was named best new artist.


“Can you believe we were singing for tips for eight years down on Broadway and now we’ve won this award? It’s one of the most wonderful nights of our lives so far,” Keifer Thompson of Thompson Square told reporters backstage.


(Writing by Jill Serjeant; Editing by Peter Cooney)


Music News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

In the Badger State, divided over and baffled by Obamacare

























BELOIT, Wisconsin (Reuters) – To Tim Givhan, Obamacare shouldn’t be an excuse for election-year polemics: “It’s a lifeline.”


A former IT specialist, Givhan tripped on a machine at work and landed on his head, suffering neurological damage. His employer’s insurance company wouldn’t pay for an operation, saying the outcome was iffy. Plagued by debilitating migraines and tremors, he quit work. His wife, an attorney, divorced him.





















Givhan, 49, has moved back to his mother’s home in Beloit, Wisconsin. He has no health insurance but expects to get it once the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, takes full effect. “I often think of killing myself,” he said. “But I have a 2-year-old son, and I can’t do that to him.”


Whether the sweeping 2010 law is fully implemented, as President Barack Obama intends, or repealed, as GOP nominee Mitt Romney pledges, no policy difference in next week’s election is likely to affect more Americans in their daily lives.


This small Midwestern city – which anthropologist Margaret Mead once called “a microcosm of America” – offers a window into what is at stake. Obamacare is dividing patients and doctors, hospitals and government regulators, workers and employers, constituents and politicians. And here, as elsewhere, many are confused about the law’s provisions.


A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos survey shows 49 percent of registered voters favor it, and 51 percent oppose it. At the same time, many who disagree with the legislation support key provisions such as cutting drug costs for seniors, expanding Medicaid coverage for the poor, and banning insurance companies from capping lifetime reimbursements or refusing coverage for preexisting conditions.


Beloit’s Community Healthcare Center, where Givhan was picking up a prescription on a recent morning, is tucked in a corner of a shopping mall. It is a tidy place with comfy chairs and wall-to-wall carpeting. Helpful receptionists nod sympathetically behind a glass window. Brochures promote vegetables in your diet.


But the small public clinic is also a place where mounting rage against the machine of American healthcare is palpable. A quarter of the patients lack health insurance. Others are in life-or-death struggles with their insurance companies. Some can’t find a surgeon who will take Medicaid.


The Affordable Care Act is expected to cut the number of uninsured Americans by 30 million over the next decade. Lynn Larsen, a clinic administrator, is eager for the law to remain in place.


“Most of our patients are working poor,” she said. “Some have 32-hour-a-week jobs at Wal-Mart and can’t afford insurance. Others were laid off from factories – their unemployment insurance has run out and they’ve lost their homes.”


The community center, with two family physicians, three registered nurses and a handful of support staff, has no beds. Seriously ill patients are referred to Beloit Memorial Hospital. “But try to find an oncologist who takes an uninsured person,” Larsen said. “They want 50 percent up front, and treatment can cost $ 500,000. If someone has lung cancer and needs charity, they’re probably going to die.”


SLOW RECOVERY


In Beloit, a city of 37,000, industry has been shrinking for decades. Shuttered hulks of century-old brick factories, some with broken windows, line the Rock River. On a recent evening a homeless man tended three fishing rods, and pulled out a wriggling sheepshead for his dinner.


The city has fought blight by preserving its historic downtown, building a sculpture-adorned bike path and fostering a farmer’s market. The economy is slowly recovering, but unemployment remains high, at 9.9 percent. That’s down from 19.1 percent in 2009 after a General Motors plant in nearby Janesville closed.


In a Reuters/Ipsos poll, 55 percent of Americans “strongly agree” with the statement “All Americans have a right to healthcare.” Another 21 percent “somewhat agree,” and only 10 percent express any disagreement.


With a 130-bed hospital, a $ 520 million budget and a staff of 1,400, Beloit Health System is the largest employer in town. Its administrators are divided over Obamacare, anticipating reforms with a mixture of hope and dread.


Senior Vice President Timothy McKevett said the law’s incentives spurred the hospital to set up an electronic records network. “We had three computer systems which didn’t talk to each other,” he said.


Under Obamacare, “regional information exchanges will allow a doctor anywhere in the state to see, ‘Oh, that patient had a lab test two weeks ago. We don’t need to do it again.’”


However, McKevett said the Affordable Care Act will cost the hospital $ 22 million over 10 years. Even before the law was enacted, Medicare and Medicaid paid less than a quarter of hospital or physician costs for treating recipients. “When we see these patients, we lose money,” he said.


Under Obamacare, more Beloiters would be covered by Medicaid, and new efficiency rules for Medicare will take effect. For example, hospitals can be denied reimbursement for some patients who are readmitted after previous stays. Doctors object because patients are often readmitted when they fail to follow instructions, rather than because of hospital negligence.


The hospital has been taking steps to cut costs. By merging with a local doctors group and eliminating duplicative CT-scanners and labs, it is saving $ 3.4 million a year. But with Obamacare, McKevett said, “We will have to do even more with less.”


‘THE SYSTEM IS COLLAPSING’


Emergency room doctor Richard Barney, who serves as Beloit Memorial‘s chief of staff, flatly opposes the law. “We can’t afford to provide healthcare to millions more people,” he said. “We already have a physician shortage. Not everyone should be able to have a knee replacement because their knee hurts.”


Given low reimbursements for private physicians, he said, “Sprained ankles and strep throats end up in our overwhelmed ERs where federal law prohibits enforcing copays. You bill till you are blue in the face, but they’re not going to pay a dime. We are the only industry in the world where you can dine and dash.”


Barney acknowledges that something must be done: “Healthcare costs are out of control. The system is collapsing before our eyes.” He favors parts of Obamacare, including the ban on denying coverage for preexisting conditions and lifting the lifetime coverage cap.


But instead of this “monstrosity of a law,” he said, the system should “be fixed piece by piece.” Barney is upset that the law fails to curb malpractice suits, which fuel expensive and unnecessary tests. “Billions are spent on defensive medicine, and nobody gives a crap because they’re in the back pocket of lawyers,” he said.


In the campaign, Democratic ads have mostly avoided the subject of Obamacare, focusing instead on attacking GOP plans to reform Medicare. Republicans and business-funded groups, who launched fierce attacks against Obamacare in the 2010 midterm elections, have continued to use it as campaign fodder.


In one spot, GOP Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan, whose congressional district adjoins Beloit, advises, “You should be in charge of your health, not government or insurance bureaucrats.”


A Romney ad criticizes Obama for “taxing wheelchairs and pacemakers” and “raiding $ 716 billion from Medicare” to pay for the program. The Medicare figure, though, is the amount expected to be saved from hospital and doctors’ costs under new regulations and does not involve cutting seniors’ benefits.


According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the law’s $ 938 billion cost over 10 years would be funded by wringing waste from Medicare and Medicaid, along with new levies, such as a tax on generous “Cadillac” insurance plans. The CBO estimates the law would cut the national deficit by $ 124 billion over a decade.


Several of Obamacare’s major provisions do not take effect until 2014, but the ones in place are having an impact. Fairbanks Morse Engine, which employs 370 workers, is among Beloit companies forced to lift a million-dollar lifetime cap for health insurance spending. Several employees with cancer have benefited.


INFORMATION GAP


At the city’s Bushel & Peck’s market, cashier Kat Tow, 23, is now covered by her father’s health insurance plan, thanks to the law’s ban on companies cutting off children before age 26. Her boyfriend, who has a seasonal job with the city parks, also gets insurance through his parents.


“Obamacare is a godsend,” she said.


At the community health center, Johnson Moore, 58, is among the clinic’s 5,000 uninsured patients to be affected once the law is fully implemented. Filling out forms on a recent morning, Moore said he has never had insurance, public or private. Since the bakery where he worked went out of business, he has been unable to afford his diabetes medicine.


“It is slowly killing me,” he said.


A few seats away, Wanda Taylor, a former restaurant manager, is also counting on the law. Her son Colin, 18, a hemophiliac, will age out of the Medicaid system next year. “It scares me half to death,” she said. “Even if he gets a job, he probably won’t get health insurance. Most people his age don’t.”


Neither Moore nor Givhan, the former IT specialist, has been able to get Badgercare, the state’s Medicaid program, which is largely reserved for mothers and children. Wisconsin, under Republican Governor Scott Walker, has joined a dozen other states in tightening access to benefits.


Obamacare would move in the opposite direction, adding as many as 11 million to Medicaid, including 170,000 in Wisconsin. Anyone earning up to 133 percent of the poverty line would be covered.


Walker, who beat back a union-sponsored recall election in June, contends Obamacare “would require the majority of people in Wisconsin to pay more money for less healthcare.”


He returned $ 38 million in federal funds allocated to Wisconsin for setting up insurance exchanges under the law, saying he hopes it will be repealed. The exchanges, which would give the state’s half-million uninsured a central place to compare and buy plans, are to take effect in 2014.


Ignorance of the law’s benefits is widespread. Among two dozen Beloiters interviewed during a recent visit, few could name even a single Obamacare provision. None were aware that, under the law, nearly 2 million Wisconsonites have been able to get free preventive services such as mammograms and colonoscopies with no copays.


None were aware that the law has saved Wisconsin Medicare recipients $ 84 million on prescription drugs since 2010; or that insurance companies are now banned from dropping people when they get sick; or that Wisconsonites got $ 10.4 million in insurance refunds because companies must now spend 80 percent of healthcare premiums on care.


“What does Obamacare do?” asked Jennifer Lorenz, a nurse at Beloit Memorial Hospital, genuinely puzzled. “I don’t know the specifics.” An Obama supporter, she was nonetheless unsure if she favors the law.


A few Beloiters were aware that Obamacare would require all Americans to have insurance – the so-called individual mandate. In the Reuters/Ipsos national survey, when questions detailing the law’s specifics were posed, that so-called individual mandate was the only provision with less than majority backing. Asked about “requiring all U.S. residents to own health insurance,” 40 percent agreed, 36 percent disagreed and 23 percent were undecided.


None of the Beloiters interviewed were aware that the law would offer subsidies for purchasing insurance to those with incomes between 133 percent and 400 percent of the poverty level.


‘A SICK-CARE SYSTEM’


At his apple stand in Beloit’s Saturday farmer’s market, Brian Van Laar said he opposes Obamacare. “I don’t think the government should get more involved in healthcare,” he said. “The constitution doesn’t say it should.”


Van Laar, whose orchard is a side business, has a day job as an engineer for an appliance manufacturer. With the new law ensuring coverage to individuals through insurance exchanges, “People at work are worried that the company will stop offering benefits,” he said. “They’ll just kick us over to Obamacare and say, ‘You’re on your own.’”


Under the law, employers who cancel their plans would be liable for penalties. Nonetheless, Jeffrey Klett, a Beloit agent who handles benefits for 70 companies, said, “I have two larger clients thinking about doing away with health insurance altogether. Clients ask, ‘Am I better off just paying the fine?’ There’s a lot of uncertainty.”


John Bottorff, vice president for human resources at Fairbanks Morse Engine, predicts that “most employers will want to continue to provide healthcare coverage. If you drop it, you could be at a competitive disadvantage in attracting and retaining employees.”


In the Reuters/Ipsos survey, 72 percent of voters favored the Obamacare provision that requires companies with more than 50 employees to offer health insurance. Only 28 percent were opposed.


Despite the ambivalence of his colleagues, Larry Bergen, director of Quality Reporting and Community Health at the hospital, calls Obamacare “a fabulous step in the right direction. More people will have insurance, so they won’t put off seeing doctors until they have a crisis.”


Bergen would have preferred a “single payer system” such as Medicare, rather than a law that relies primarily on private insurance companies. “People say the Canadian and British systems have flaws, but those countries have better life expectancy and less infant mortality than we do,” he said.


“We don’t have a healthcare system – we have a sick-care system. Fifty percent of health dollars are spent on the sickest 5 percent. If you’re sick, we do great things, like an angioplasty in the middle of a heart attack. But people can’t get in to see a primary care doctor.”


Proponents of the law expect millions more to get treatment for high blood pressure to avoid a stroke, take cholesterol-lowering drugs to ward off a heart attack or get early diabetes intervention to prevent a gangrenous foot amputation.


“People can criticize the law, and we’ll have a chance over the years to make it better,” said Timothy Cullen, a former Blue Cross executive who represents Beloit in the state senate. Presidents have tried for a century to get healthcare for all Americans, he added. “They all failed and Obama succeeded. It’s long overdue.”


The Reuters/Ipsos database is now public and searchable here: http://www.tinyurl.com/reuterspoll


(Reporting by Margot Roosevelt; editing by Lee Aitken and Prudence Crowther)


Medications/Drugs News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Sandy Crimps East Coast Gasoline

























Ahead of Hurricane Sandy, refineries along the East Coast shut down and braced for the worst. With the storm gone, about half those refineries have come back on line, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. That will surely help motorists. But even before the storm, the East Coast was facing a chronic lack of gasoline, with stocks lower than they had been in more than 20 years.


As lines form outside gasoline stations, and some of them begin to run out of gasoline, the real problem on the East Coast isn’t the refineries. It’s the terminals—the giant storage depots surrounding New York Harbor where ships and rail cars unload refined products, and where gasoline piped up from the Gulf Coast gets collected. If you’ve ever flown into JFK or LaGuardia, these are the big clusters of white tanks you saw dotting the landscape south of the city.





















The East Coast refines a lot of gasoline, but most of what it uses comes from somewhere else. These storage tanks are the crucial gathering point for the East Coast’s gasoline distribution system. Right now, they’re not working.


Most of those terminals took a direct hit from Sandy. Not only do they not have power, they’ve been badly damaged; many took on sea water and mud as they were banged around during the storm. At least two tanks have sprung leaks.


A facility owned by Motiva Enterprises, a joint venture of Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA:LN) and Saudi Refining, leaked about 336,000 gallons of diesel fuel that crews were busy containing on Thursday morning. Another tank at Kinder Morgan’s (KMI) 200-acre storage terminal just west of Staten Island in Carteret, N.J., was damaged when another tank was knocked into it during the storm. “I know that one tank hit another tank and that caused a tear in its side,” Kinder Morgan spokesman Joe Hollier said.


Carteret is the biggest of Kinder Morgan’s four terminals in the U.S. Northeast. The company is sending hundreds of workers to clean up and assess the damage and also bring in large generators to try to restore power. The company announced on Thursday that operations should resume within 48 hours.


One of the biggest terminals around New York Harbor, a 600-acre storage facility 10 miles south of Manhattan in Bayonne, N.J., suffered major damage, according to Dow Jones. The terminal is owned by New Orleans-based IMTT, which has not yet commented on the damage. Reached by phone Thursday, the Bayonne terminal manager said simply, “I’m only talking to the government,” and hung up.


With the terminals unable to accept more product, or load it onto trucks to deliver to area gas stations, the pipelines that connect to them have had to shut down. The Colonial Pipeline is the primary gasoline artery to the Northeast, carrying some 2.4 billion barrels a day of gasoline, diesel, and other fuels to the Northeast from the Gulf Coast. With nowhere to deposit that fuel, a huge chunk of the Colonial has been closed. Though Colonial’s operations have slowly begun to resume, the resulting pipeline closure has caused a huge back-up in the system that is rippling all the way down to the Gulf Coast.


“Supplies on the Gulf Coast are starting to back up and look for other outlets,” says Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates, a consulting firm in Houston. Lipow estimates that at least half a dozen ships filled with oil or other refined products are floating outside New York Harbor, unable to deliver their cargo. With further refined products building up on the Gulf Coast, and fewer ships there to move them, the rates that ship owners are charging has nearly doubled in the last few days, according to Charles Martin of  MJLF & Associates, a Connecticut-based ship broker.


“The ship owners definitely have the upper hand right now,” says Martin. “I’ve never seen anything this extreme.” Most of the product—particularly diesel fuel—that would get piped up to the Northeast is now being sent to Europe, Martin said.


Despite all the disruption however, national gas prices are expected to continue to drop as demand remains low because of all the destruction Sandy caused. “This is a logistics and distribution problem, not a price problem,” Lipow says. “Prices have been falling around the country and will continue to do so.”


Businessweek.com — Top News



Read More..

Clinton calls for overhaul of Syrian opposition

























ZAGREB (Reuters) – The United States called on Wednesday for an overhaul of Syria‘s opposition leadership, saying it was time to move beyond the Syrian National Council and bring in those “in the front lines fighting and dying”.


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, signaling a more active stance by Washington in attempts to form a credible political opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, said a meeting next week in Qatar would be an opportunity to broaden the coalition against him.





















“This cannot be an opposition represented by people who have many good attributes but who, in many instances, have not been inside Syria for 20, 30, 40 years,” she said during a visit to Croatia.


“There has to be a representation of those who are in the front lines fighting and dying today to obtain their freedom.”


Clinton’s comments represented a clear break with the Syrian National Council (SNC), a largely foreign-based group which has been among the most vocal proponents of international intervention in the Syrian conflict.


U.S. officials have privately expressed frustration with the SNC’s inability to come together with a coherent plan and with its lack of traction with the disparate internal groups which have waged the 19-month uprising against Assad’s government.


Senior members of the SNC, Free Syrian Army (FSA) and other rebel groups ended a meeting in Turkey on Wednesday and pledged to unite behind a transitional government in coming months.


“It’s been our divisions that have allowed the Assad forces to reach this point,” Ammar al-Wawi, a rebel commander, told Reuters after the talks outside Istanbul.


“We are united on toppling Assad. Everyone, including all the rebels, will gather under the transitional government.”


Mohammad Al-Haj Ali, a senior Syrian military defector, told a news conference after the meeting: “We are still facing some difficulties between the politicians and different opposition groups and the leaders of the Free Syrian Army on the ground.”


Clinton said it was important that the next rulers of Syria were both inclusive and committed to rejecting extremism.


“There needs to be an opposition that can speak to every segment and every geographic part of Syria. And we also need an opposition that will be on record strongly resisting the efforts by extremists to hijack the Syrian revolution,” she said.


Syria’s revolt has killed an estimated 32,000. A bomb near a Shi’ite shrine in a suburb of Damascus killed at least six more people on Wednesday, state media and opposition activists said.


NEW LEADERSHIP


The meeting next week in Qatar’s capital Doha represents a chance to forge a new leadership, Clinton said, adding the United States had helped to “smuggle out” representatives of internal Syrian opposition groups to a meeting in New York last month to argue their case for inclusion.


“We have recommended names and organizations that we believe should be included in any leadership structure,” she told a news conference.


“We’ve made it clear that the SNC can no longer be viewed as the visible leader of the opposition. They can be part of a larger opposition, but that opposition must include people from inside Syria and others who have a legitimate voice which must be heard.”


The United States and its allies have struggled for months to craft a credible opposition coalition.


U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration has said it is not providing arms to internal opponents of Assad and is limiting its aid to non-lethal humanitarian assistance.


It concedes, however, that some of its allies are providing lethal assistance – a fact that Assad’s chief backer Russia says shows western powers are intent on determining Syria’s future.


Russia and China have blocked three U.N. Security Council resolutions aimed at increasing pressure on the Assad government, leading the United States and its allies to say they could move beyond U.N. structures for their next steps.


Clinton said she regretted but was not surprised by the failure of the latest attempted ceasefire, called by international mediator Lakhdar Brahimi last Friday. Each side blamed the other for breaking the truce.


“The Assad regime did not suspend its use of advanced weaponry against the Syrian people for even one day,” she said.


“While we urge Special Envoy Brahimi to do whatever he can in Moscow and Beijing to convince them to change course and support a stronger U.N. action we cannot and will not wait for that.”


Clinton said the United States would continue to work with partners to increase sanctions on the Assad government and provide humanitarian assistance to those hit by the conflict.


(Additional reporting by Ayla Jean Yackley; editing by Andrew Roche)


World News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Where You’re Not Likely to Get Cell Service Because of Sandy

























It’s hard to tell exactly where the cell phone outages are happening without exact information from the wireless companies, but because of the way cell phone technology works, we know that the densest areas with the most power outages and the worst weather damage—i.e., downtown Manhattan—are where cell service is hurting the most. Here’s what we know: The Federal Communications Commission said Sandy knocked out 25 percent of all cell sites. As of Wednesday, Verizon said that 6 percent of its cell sites were still down, T-Mobile said that 20 percent of its New York City network was down and 10 percent was down in Washington, and AT&T declined to comment, reports The New York Times‘s Edward Wyatt. Those numbers might not sound huge, but because of the nature of the outages, they are enough to frustrate downtown Manhattanites. 


RELATED: The Pros and Cons of the Different Ways to Buy an iPhone 4S





















The two biggest things that affect cell sites during storms are physical damage from wind and electricity. Both of those things happened during the storm over the last few days, especially in New York City and New Jersey, but all along the East Coast. Even with the power out in these areas, the sites can run on batteries and back up generators. Sprint has said its back-up power sources can last between 2 and 3 days, reports CNET’s Merguerite Reardon. In the meantime, these companies can send people out to refuel. But the F.C.C said to expect that things will get worse as some sites shut down and others overload with users. 


RELATED: The Little Luxuries of Life Without a Cell Phone


Then there’s all the water that got into the cell towers, possibly causing damage and requiring repairs that might involve replacing parts. Those fixes will take longer because they can only happen once the water has cleared out. The cell phone companies have asked the city to help them pump out the water, according to Reuters yesterday. 


RELATED: The Most Unbelievable but Real Pictures of Sandy’s Destruction


The factors are all impacting Lower Manhattan, where, anecdotally, cell service is nonexistent. “Even charged cell phones south of 29th Street get no service at all,” wrote the ever-more-uncomfortable in-New-York Andrew Sullivan at the Daily Dish. It feels like that because much of downtown still has no power and there are a lot of people trying to use the few remaining operational cell sites. But that alone doesn’t mean that there is “no service at all” because of the way cell phone infrastructure works, as Reardon explains it:



If a cell site goes down, then customers in that area may not receive any service. And in rural areas where there are fewer cell sites, that’s more likely. But in places like New York City, where there are hundreds of cell sites in relatively close proximity, users may be able pick up signals from adjacent cell sites. This is likely why people won’t have service on one city block, but they will if they move in one direction or another.



However, with fewer cell sites, the ones still kicking are getting overloaded with refugee phone users, making it harder for customers to get calls and texts through. To combat these issues, T-Mobile and AT&T announced they would share networks in storm-damaged areas of New York and New Jersey. That should alleviate things a little, but until the power returns, New Yorkers can expect more of the same patchy service they’ve been getting. And even then, the cell companies will likely have some water damage repairs to do. 


Wireless News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

“A Late Quartet” Review: classical-music drama gets soapy but actors avoid the false notes

























LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) – “A Late Quartet,” as it turns out, has more than one meaning: The film’s musicians spend most of the movie grappling with Beethoven’s Opus 131, the String Quartet No. 14 in C# Minor, which was one of the composer’s “late quartets,” completed the year before his death.


But the title also refers to a foursome of players whose relationship as a performing entity could very well reach its demise at any moment. When cellist Peter (Christopher Walken) is diagnosed with Parkinson’s, he announces his intention to leave the Fugue String Quartet, which has just celebrated its 25th anniversary. The news rocks Peter’s colleagues, all of whom are decades younger, and the impending seismic shift exposes unspoken rivalries and frustrations among the rest of the group.





















For second violinist Robert (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the shake-up in the roster inspires him to demand that he take first chair on some pieces. The idea that Robert wants to be less Pip and more Gladys Knight completely rankles the quartet’s precise and arrogant first violinist, Daniel (Mark Ivanir). Robert‘s wife Juliette (Catherine Keener), who plays viola, can barely process her grief over the illness of her mentor Peter before finding herself stuck between the conflicting demands of Daniel (her former lover) and Robert.


Complicating matters further is the fact that Robert and Juliette’s daughter Alexandra (Imogen Poots), a talented violinist in her own right, is currently studying under both Peter and Daniel – and possibly nurturing feelings of her own for the latter while also nursing resentment toward her globe-trotting parents for being absent during so much of her childhood.


So yes, “A Late Quartet” may ensconce itself in the elite and heady world of classical music – down to the cameos by cellist Nina Lee and mezzo-soprano Anne Sofie von Otter – but the character dynamics could easily find a home on The CW. Nonetheless, if you’re in the mood to mix highbrow trappings with some bitter arguments, infidelity and face-slapping, screenwriters Yaron Zilberman (who also directs) and Seth Grossman keep things allegro con brio throughout.


Hoffman and Keener, who are pretty much the William Powell and Myrna Loy of indie movies at this point, bring their shared screen experience to their portrayal of a married couple who seem perfectly matched but whose longstanding relationship is patched together with compromises and unspoken desires. The moment where Robert seeks Juliette’s assurance that he’s skilled enough to play first violin, and she hesitates to agree, is a powerfully devastating marital moment.


Ivanir makes his character convincing as both a cold taskmaster and a hot-blooded romantic, and Poots explodes with youthful passion and indecision, all the while rocking a deadly accurate privileged-New-Yorker accent that many of her fellow U.K. thespians would envy.


Christopher Walken manages to be as compelling here as in “Seven Psychopaths” while playing an altogether different character. Walken may have reached the point in his career where he inspires impersonators, but both of his current films remind audiences that he still has a deep well of emotion that make him more than just the sum of his trademark delivery.


“A Late Quartet” may be better suited for the back-balcony crowd who wears jeans and comfortable shoes to the symphony rather than the folks who know their Kochel listings by heart, but sometimes it’s worth sitting through forgettable music just to watch a great group of players plying their trade.


Movies News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Study Finds Flu Shot Can Cut Heart Attack Risk by Half

























Yet another study was presented this past weekend that shows a correlation between receiving a flu shot and a reduced risk of heart attack or stroke. The study, which was presented at the 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Congress in Toronto on Sunday, concluded that getting a flu shot reduced a person’s risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke by half, according to a report by MyHealthNewsDaily.


This latest study, which was conducted by researchers working through the auspices of the Women’s College Hospital and the University of Toronto, compared data from four previous studies regarding the effect of the flu vaccine on heart disease. While some of the more than 3,000 participants already had heart conditions, many did not. Participants in the studies had been divided into three groups — those that were given a flu shot, those who were given a placebo, and those that were not given a shot of any kind.





















According to a press release that accompanied the study’s presentation on Sunday, lead researcher Dr. Jacob Udell believes that given the mounting evidence that flu shots not only protect against influenza, but also provide other health benefits, the percentage of the general population that gets the shot is “still much too low.” Udell noted that less than 50 percent of the population actually gets the shot, and that it is even “poorly used among healthcare workers.”


Udell’s study is one of several larger studies in the past few years that have reached the same conclusions. One of the first such studies was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April of 2003. The NEJM study specifically focused on the link between the influenza vaccine and a lower risk of heart disease among the elderly. That research, which involved nearly 300,000 people over the age of 65, was among the first to begin recommending a flu shot for elderly populations for reasons besides just protection from influenza.


Another such study was published in 2010 in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. That research, according to a report by Reuters, again focused on the link between the flu shot and a person’s risk of developing heart disease. Again scientists found that the flu shot appeared to reduce people’s risk of suffering a “first-time” heart attack, but they could not conclusively prove that the flu shot was the reason.


Speaking regarding the results of his own study, Udell said in his press release on Sunday that he felt that the study’s conclusions needed to be researched on a larger scale. While he said that his findings should influence “current guideline recommendations” for people that have already suffered a heart attack or had a prior history of heart disease, it would require a “large, lengthier multinational study” to “comprehensively demonstrate” the flu vaccine’s success in reducing the risk of developing other specific ailments.


Vanessa Evans is a musician and freelance writer based in Michigan, who frequently covers health and nutrition topics.


Diseases/Conditions News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Child benefit cuts ‘cost £50,000′


























Some families may lose as much as £50,000 over the next 18 years due to cuts in child benefit, the accountancy firm PwC says.





















The government will start to withdraw, or cut altogether, child benefit from families where an adult earns more than £50,000 a year.


The benefit clawback will start on 7 January 2013 and will affect about one million families.


PwC says their potential loss could be substantial.


“Many people affected by the child benefit cuts have probably not considered what the true cost will be to them over time,” said Alex Henderson, a tax partner at PwC.


Losses rack up


Child benefit is currently paid at the rate of £20.30 a week for the first child, and then £13.40 a week for each child after that.


It lasts until each child reaches 16, or 18 if they are still in full-time education, and in some cases until they are 20.


Continue reading the main story
  • Child benefit is a tax-free payment that is aimed at helping parents cope with the cost of bringing up children

  • One parent can claim £20.30 a week for an eldest or only child and £13.40 a week for each of their other children

  • The payments apply to all children aged under 16 and in some cases until they are 20 years old

  • The system is administered by HM Revenue and Customs, which pays out to nearly 7.9 million families, with 13.7 million children


PwC took two hypothetical families to see how much money they might lose, if all their benefits were withdrawn because one of the adults earned more than the forthcoming upper limit of £60,000 a year.


In one family, there were two children aged 1 and 3 at the start of 2013, currently receiving £1,752 a year in total.


In the other, there were three children aged 1, 3 and 5, currently receiving £2,449 a year in total.


PwC worked out that the two-child family stood to lose just under £39,000 in total, by the time the youngest child turned 18, while the three-child family would lose rather more at £50,700.


The calculations assumed that without the clawback, the families’ benefits would have risen in line with the consumer prices index, at a rate of 2.5% in 2013 and then 2% thereafter until 2029.


‘Grossly unfair’


Carol, a mother of three from Southampton, told the BBC News website that she was shocked at how the sums involved would add up over the years.


“We currently receive £2,260 a year, we are not on the breadline but it is the equivalent of paying for a family holiday,” she said.


“The change is grossly unfair. We decided that one of us should stay at home to look after the family, but we are being penalised,” she added.


She said her complaint to her MP had been channelled up to ministers but the reply had been that the cutback she faces was justified because it would help maintain the benefits for lower-paid claimants.


HMRC is starting to send out letters this week targeted at about one million child benefit recipients, who it thinks are also in households where someone earns more than £50,000 a year.


The letters warn them that they may lose some or all of their child benefit next year if they or their partner’s earnings are above that limit.


The letters offer the recipients a choice – tell the Revenue about the family’s income, using the self-assessment system if necessary, so the taxman can calculate the extra tax charge; or give up claiming the child benefit altogether.


The Revenue does make it clear that in families where someone earns between £50,000 and £60,000, it will always be to their advantage to keep on claiming the benefit.


BBC News – Business



Read More..